For the last year or so I have been working in the world of raising money for investment funds focused on real estate. Primarily we are building a database and calling on university endowments, state and other public pension funds as well as private pension funds (like corporate pension plans). The fund managers that we are raising capital for are all first time managers.
The process is an interesting one. There are literally billions of dollars in investment capital available but the pension fund reps are so overwhelmed with inquiries seeking capital that it is very tough to break in a new manager.
The system seems very "broken" when you start to learn about it. There are undoubtedly many, many new managers that could produce excellent returns for these pension funds (and given the increasing demands for returns by the funds, they need high returns), but because of the information asymmetry problem (no time to vet new managers or manage the risk inherent in a new manager), few new managers are given a chance.
Shouldn't there be some kind of "farm system" for new managers? Something where an investment club of save 5-10 similarly situated endowments or funds like Harvard, Yale, MIT, UC or Calstrs, Calprs, NYSTRS could invest relatively small amounts (say $5M each) and fund a new manager or group of managers? Then as the manager are vetted they can "graduate" to the next level where they have their own fund with larger amounts from each investor? And the investors, for their hard work and risk get the opportunity (and right) to invest in future funds?
Seems like technology could also enable this. By having a simple web based management/governance system that goes from gathering initial submissions to monitoring investment performance, you could somewhat automate the process of managing this small program and make it functional for the large funds to try this.
There are a couple firms with allocations from Calstrs doing this now - but they are really creating their own fund in cooperation with the emerging manager and taking a piece of the promote -which is not as attractive for the manager, obviously.
Showing posts with label private equity real estate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label private equity real estate. Show all posts
Friday, November 02, 2007
Tuesday, August 07, 2007
Community Reinvestment Act (CRA)
Most financial institutions that makes loans to consumers are required to meet a set of federal laws collectively known as the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).
"The CRA was enacted in 1977 to prevent redlining and to encourage banks and thrifts to help meet the credit needs of all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods." (from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency - one of the chief enforcement bodies of the CRA)
Most financial institutions satisfy their CRA requirements in two ways: (1) lending to lower income customers or in lower income communities and (2) buying tax credits wherein the proceeds of the tax credit sale go to fund affordable housing.
A few (mostly larger) institutions will directly invest in affordable housing and other initiatives that support low and moderate income communities (venture capital targeted at businesses in low income communities is one example).
The interesting disconnect in this market comes from the fact that most of the tax credit deals only go to larger institutions because it is just easier to sell the deals (and more deals) to these larger customers. Often the smaller financial institutions get shut out and have a lack of CRA qualifying deals to pick from.
The other interesting issue is that the institutions have to meet geographic requirements (invest/lend in their service areas). There can often be an asymmetrical information problem because the institution is not made aware of all the deals in their service area and the entity raising capital doesn't know of all the potential investors/financial institutions who can "get credit" for investing in their deals.
To date, there is no central clearing house for this information, nor is there anyway for smaller institutions to band together to go after the "bigger" opportunities, or to directly invest in affordable housing and earn CRA credit (without making a direct loan on a property, which they may consider too risky).
"The CRA was enacted in 1977 to prevent redlining and to encourage banks and thrifts to help meet the credit needs of all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods." (from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency - one of the chief enforcement bodies of the CRA)
Most financial institutions satisfy their CRA requirements in two ways: (1) lending to lower income customers or in lower income communities and (2) buying tax credits wherein the proceeds of the tax credit sale go to fund affordable housing.
A few (mostly larger) institutions will directly invest in affordable housing and other initiatives that support low and moderate income communities (venture capital targeted at businesses in low income communities is one example).
The interesting disconnect in this market comes from the fact that most of the tax credit deals only go to larger institutions because it is just easier to sell the deals (and more deals) to these larger customers. Often the smaller financial institutions get shut out and have a lack of CRA qualifying deals to pick from.
The other interesting issue is that the institutions have to meet geographic requirements (invest/lend in their service areas). There can often be an asymmetrical information problem because the institution is not made aware of all the deals in their service area and the entity raising capital doesn't know of all the potential investors/financial institutions who can "get credit" for investing in their deals.
To date, there is no central clearing house for this information, nor is there anyway for smaller institutions to band together to go after the "bigger" opportunities, or to directly invest in affordable housing and earn CRA credit (without making a direct loan on a property, which they may consider too risky).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
